Love Never Keeps Promises, Only Promises Keep Love

-
  Love Never Keeps Promises, Only Promises Keep Love Why the Foundation of Human Love is Not Feeling, but Commitment --- Introduction Since the fall of humanity into sin, our ability to love perfectly has been tainted. Human love becomes fragile, inconsistent, and vulnerable to self-interest. In this condition, God no longer bases His relationship with humanity on easily forgotten "words of love," but on eternal covenantal promises. This principle applies not only to the relationship between humans and God but also to interpersonal relationships—including marriage. --- 1. Love Never Keeps Promises Love, in the sense of human feeling, is fluctuating. It can strengthen in times of joy and weaken in the midst of difficulty. The biblical narrative is full of examples of human infidelity: - Israel repeatedly forgot their love for God and turned to idols. - David, called "a man after God's own heart," fell into adultery and murder. - Peter, who claimed he was ready to...
Posting Komentar

The Trinity and the Theological Framework of God

-

 The Trinity and the Theological Framework of God


The doctrine of the Trinity serves as a foundational framework in Christian theology for understanding the nature of God. Unlike strict monotheistic models (e.g., Islamic Tawhid or Jewish Unitarianism), the Trinity reconciles divine unity with relational complexity—presenting God as one essence in three distinct persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.  


The Trinity offers a unique framework for explaining certain aspects of God’s nature that are difficult to unravel in traditional Unitarian theology. However, this requires nuanced discussion:  


 1. The Strengths of the Trinity in Explaining God’s Nature  

Here are examples where the Trinity provides more coherent answers:  


 a. Eternal Love (Without an External Object)  

- Unitarian Problem:  

  - If God is "Love" (1 John 4:8), but before creation there was no object of love, how did love exist?  

  - Islam and Judaism use the concept of eternal attributes, but these remain potential in nature.  


- Trinitarian Solution:  

  - Intra-Trinitarian love (the Father loves the Son, the Spirit unites) exists eternally (John 17:24).  

  - "God does not need the world to love" (Hans Urs von Balthasar).  


 b. Incarnation & Redemption  

- Unitarian Problem:  

  - How can a transcendent God suffer on the cross?  

  - Islam resolves this with the concept of Kalām Allāh (Quran 4:171), but it lacks personal relationality.  


- Trinitarian Solution:  

  - The Son (Logos) becomes human while the Father remains in heaven.  

  - "God died as man, without ceasing to be God" (St. Cyril).  


 c. God-Human Communication  

- Unitarian Problem:  

  - If God is wholly "Other," how can He be known?  

  - Islamic/Jewish mysticism uses tajalli (manifestation) but lacks clear structure.  


- Trinitarian Solution:  

  - The Son is the "visible image of the invisible God" (Col. 1:15).  

  - The Holy Spirit bridges the transcendence-immanence gap.  


---


 2. But There Are Trade-Offs (Logical Consequences)  

The Trinity also introduces new challenges:  


| Strengths | Criticisms/Challenges |

|--------------|----------------------|

| Explains eternal love | The "three persons" concept is hard to grasp without falling into tritheism |

| Makes incarnation possible | Risk of anthropomorphism (God "becoming" something) |

| More personal God-world relationship | Doctrinal complexity (Hypostasis vs. Ousia distinctions) |


---


 3. Comparison with Other Models  

 a. Islam (Asmaul Husna)  

- Strength: Simplicity of Tawhid (Quran 112).  

- Limitation: Difficulty explaining how God relates personally without compromising oneness.  


 b. Judaism (Kabbalah)  

- Strength: The Sefirot emanation preserves oneness while explaining complexity.  

- Limitation: No concept of "God becoming man."  


 c. Hinduism (Advaita Vedanta)  

- Strength: Brahman-Atman explains transcendent unity.  

- Limitation: No room for personal relationality.  


---


 4. Conclusion: "Easier" But Not "The Only Way"  

1. The Trinity is indeed a powerful conceptual tool for:  

   - Maintaining both God’s oneness and complexity.  

   - Addressing problems of divine relationality.  


2. But it’s not without trade-offs:  

   - Requires a leap of faith regarding "3 in 1."  

   - Not more "rational" than Tawhid, just more comprehensive for certain questions.  


3. Choice depends on theological priorities:  

   - If logical simplicity is key: Islamic/Jewish Tawhid excels.  

   - If relational depth is desired: The Trinity is more adequate.  


> "The Trinity is not a mathematical formula but a map to explain the experience of the living God."  

> — Karl Rahner  


- For Christians, the Trinity is the highest revelation, not a product of philosophical speculation.  

- For non-Christians, it can be seen as an alternative language for complex oneness.  

- The real question: Not "which is correct," but "which leads more effectively to a transformative experience of the Divine."  


As Gregory Nazianzus said:  

"Concerning God, it is more important to undergo inner transformation than merely to define."

  


 Key Theological Contributions of the Trinity  

1. Dynamic Oneness  

   - Unitarian Challenge: Absolute oneness (e.g., Islam’s Tawhid) struggles to explain how a solitary God can be intrinsically relational.  

   - Trinitarian Resolution: Eternal love and communion exist within the Godhead (John 17:24), eliminating the need for creation to "activate" divine attributes like love.  


2. Divine-Human Mediation  

   - The Son (Jesus) bridges transcendence and immanence, enabling:  

     - Incaranation: God participating in human suffering (Phil. 2:6-8).  

     - Revelation: A personal, knowable God (Col. 1:15).  

   - The Holy Spirit sustains God’s immanent presence post-ascension (John 14:26).  


3. Metaphysical Coherence  

   - Addresses paradoxes like:  

     - How God can be love (1 John 4:8) without dependence on creation.  

     - How a timeless God interacts with time (via the Son’s earthly life).  


 Comparative Perspectives  

| Model | Strengths | Limitations |  

|-------------------|-------------------------------|------------------------------------|  

| Christian Trinity | Integrates unity & relationality | Complexity risks tri-theism or modalism |  

| Islamic Tawhid | Absolute simplicity | Relationality often reduced to voluntarism (God’s will alone) |  

| Jewish Kabbalah | Emanations (Sefirot) balance unity/multiplicity | Lacks Christological fulfillment |  


 Critiques and Responses  

- "Irrational Mystery?"  

  Critics argue the Trinity defies logic (e.g., "3=1"). Yet proponents clarify it’s a theological mystery—not a contradiction but a supra-rational reality (cf. Augustine’s De Trinitate).  

- Historical Development  

  While fully articulated in the 4th century, early Christian worship (e.g., baptismal formulas in Matt. 28:19) reflects proto-Trinitarian thought.  


 Conclusion: A Framework, Not a Formula  

The Trinity is less about "solving" God’s nature and more about:  

- Preserving biblical revelations (e.g., Christ’s divinity, Pentecost).  

- Enabling a relational theology where God is both beyond and intimately involved in creation.  


As Thomas Torrance noted:  

"The Trinity is the grammar of Christian discourse about God." Its value lies not in systematic perfection but in its capacity to re

flect the God who is love—eternally, essentially, and relationally.

Klik here to explore more about Trinity👈

Read Other Article (Click or Tap Here)


God Bless

July 19, 2025

Mantiri AAM

Komentar

Posting Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

The Theory of "Yahweh Outside Israel" (Latest Archaeological Evidence)

-
The Theory of "Yahweh Outside Israel" (Latest Archaeological Evidence) There are several recent theories and findings that attempt to link other nations outside of ancient Israel with the worship of Yahweh (or a similar deity). However, most are still speculative or controversial. Here are some modern approaches: a. Kuntillet Ajrud Inscription (8th Century BC, Sinai) -   An inscription was found reading "Yahweh and his Asherah" (possibly referring to a divine pair of Yahweh and the goddess Asherah). -   It indicates that Yahweh was worshipped in regions outside Israel, perhaps by Edomites or Midianites. b. Khirbet el-Qom Inscription (Ancient Judea) -   Contains the name "Yahweh" alongside a phrase of protection, suggesting the worship of Yahweh among non-Israelites (or at least its influence). c. The Midianite-Kenite Hypothesis (The Origin of Yahweh Before Israel) -   Some scholars (like Prof. Thomas Römer) argue that Yahweh may have originated as a storm ...
Baca selengkapnya

Paraclete in Islam ?

-
 Paraclete in Different Theologies The following is an in-depth analysis of the claim that "Ahmad" (أحمد) is the Arabic translation of "Parakletos" in John 14:16, examined from:   (1) The hermeneutics of the Greek text, (2) Arabic exegesis, and (3) Semitic linguistic context.   ---    I. Analysis of John 14:16 in the Original Language    A. Greek (Original New Testament)   - "Parakletos" (παράκλητος):     - Literal meaning: "One called to stand beside" (from para = beside, kalein = to call).     - Theological meaning:       - In John 14:16: Comforter/Helper/Advocate (RSV: "Helper," KJV: "Comforter").       - In 1 John 2:1: Jesus as "Parakletos" (Advocate before the Father).    B. Syriac/Aramaic Version (Peshitta)   - "Parakletos" is translated as "Menahmana" (ܡܢܚܡܢܐ):     - Means "Comforter" (cognate with Hebrew "N...
Baca selengkapnya

The Fall, Theta, and the Lost Childlike Faith

-
  The Fall, Theta, and the Lost Childlike Faith: A Reflection on Knowledge and Innocence    Introduction   The story of Adam and Eve’s expulsion from Eden is more than a myth—it’s a profound exploration of humanity’s shift from innocent unity to fractured duality. At its core lies a paradox: the very knowledge that was supposed to make them "like God" (Genesis 3:5) instead alienated them from divine communion. What if this transition mirrors a deeper metaphysical principle—one that can even be framed through the lens of mathematics, physics, and theology?   This article examines the "theta state" of primordial innocence, the collapse into moral duality after eating the forbidden fruit, and Jesus’ call to reclaim childlike faith—not as ignorance, but as surrendered wisdom.   ---    1. Theta (θ): The State of Sacred Ignorance   Before the Fall, Adam and Eve existed in a state of pure relational trust—unashamed, una...
Baca selengkapnya