QAApologetika

Christian Jihad - 4 A Terminological Blunder So, the word "jihad" is the irony of Christianity itself. Thus, "pairing it" with the word "Christian" as the title of an academic book is a major blunder—if without additional explanation directly on the cover. Let us examine this from the perspective of publishing science and its impact on readers. Sometimes our good intentions can be used by the devil, although of course we believe that the end result is victory for God Himself. --- 1. The Irony of "Jihad" in Christianity In Christianity, the greatest "struggle" is precisely to stop struggling. This is the irony that confuses the world. The world says: "Fight to win." But the cross says: "Die, then you will live." The world says: "Fight your enemies." But the cross says: "Love your enemies." The world says: "Establish justice with force." But the cross says: "Leave judgment to God....

Christian Jihad - 3 Once Again, Let Us Look at the Blunder Using the title "Christian Jihad." Christian jihad (struggle) does not point to the core of the teaching. This is very easily understood in a secular way because the word "Christian" itself is not something for us to "struggle for." Let us examine and dissect this more critically, guided by the Holy Spirit and Scripture. --- 1. The Main Problem: "Christian" Is Not a Battlefield Christianity never teaches that the identity "Christian" is something that must be established, defended, or struggled for in any way—let alone through violence or coercion. On the contrary, Scripture teaches: · Christ has already struggled and won. On the cross, Jesus said, "It is finished" (John 19:30). The work of salvation is complete. There is nothing we need to "add" through our struggle. · We are recipients of grace, not warriors who seize. Salvation is a gift, not the result of...

Christian Jihad - 2 (A Terminological Blunder) The attempt to build terminological bridges is a conceptual blunder when equating the "Way of the Cross" with "Islamic Jihad" as if they were equivalent. That is a fallacy that must not be left unchallenged. Let us examine this honestly and decisively. --- 1. Why This Equation Is Mistaken: Fundamental Differences Aspect – Way of the Cross (Christianity) – Islamic Jihad (in normative understanding) Theological Basis – Following Christ, who accepted suffering without resisting (1 Peter 2:21-23) – Active struggle to establish God's will on earth, including through violence under certain conditions Attitude Toward Enemies – Love them, pray for them, do not retaliate (Matthew 5:44) – Enemies who fight Islam may be physically opposed (Quran 2:190-191) Ultimate Goal – Leave judgment to God; salvation is a gift – Establish divine justice in the world; salvation is linked to effort and sharia Primary Model – Jesus, who did n...

Christian Jihad - 1 (A Terminological Blunder) This is a bridge that is too bold and unnecessary. Attempting to connect our entire discussion—about the absolute God, love as a refining fire, respect for free will, and wrath as an expression of love—with the concept of "jihad" in Christianity is a mistake. Comparing jihad in its popular meaning (physical struggle) and jihad as spiritual struggle in Islam with the Way of the Cross (struggling against one's own tendency to judge and impose one's will) in Christianity is erroneous. Let us examine this honestly. --- 1. First, Purifying the Terminology of "Jihad" The Arabic word "jihad" literally means "to struggle" or "to exert maximum effort." In Islam, it has two levels. The first level is the "greater jihad" (jihad akbar), which is the struggle against one's own passions and internal temptations. The second level is the "lesser jihad" (jihad asghar), which ...

  Love Never Keeps Promises, Only Promises Keep Love Why the Foundation of Human Love is Not Feeling, but Commitment --- Introduction Since the fall of humanity into sin, our ability to love perfectly has been tainted. Human love becomes fragile, inconsistent, and vulnerable to self-interest. In this condition, God no longer bases His relationship with humanity on easily forgotten "words of love," but on eternal covenantal promises. This principle applies not only to the relationship between humans and God but also to interpersonal relationships—including marriage. --- 1. Love Never Keeps Promises Love, in the sense of human feeling, is fluctuating. It can strengthen in times of joy and weaken in the midst of difficulty. The biblical narrative is full of examples of human infidelity: - Israel repeatedly forgot their love for God and turned to idols. - David, called "a man after God's own heart," fell into adultery and murder. - Peter, who claimed he was ready to...

Cinta (Tuhan) Tak Pernah (Membuat Manusia) Menepati Janji, Hanya Janji (Tuhan) yang (Yang Membuat Manusia) Menjaga Cinta (Disaat Ia Jatuh) Mengapa Fondasi Kasih Manusia Bukan Perasaan, Melainkan Komitmen ---  Pendahuluan   Sejak manusia jatuh dalam dosa, kemampuannya untuk mencintai dengan sempurna telah ternoda. Cinta manusiawi menjadi rapuh, tidak konsisten, dan rentan terhadap kepentingan diri. Dalam kondisi ini, Allah tidak lagi menggantungkan hubungan-Nya dengan umat pada "kata-kata cinta" yang mudah dilupakan, tetapi pada janji-janji perjanjian yang kekal. Prinsip ini tidak hanya berlaku bagi hubungan manusia dengan Tuhan, tetapi juga bagi relasi antarmanusia—termasuk pernikahan. ---  1. Cinta Tak Pernah Menepati Janji   Cinta, dalam artian perasaan manusiawi, adalah sesuatu yang fluktuatif. Ia bisa menguat di saat bahagia dan melemah di tengah kesulitan. Narasi Alkitab penuh dengan contoh ketidaksetiaan manusia:   - Israel berulang kal...