Explaining the Resurrection - 3

Explaining the Resurrection - 3 Another Perspective APOLOGETICS DOCUMENT SUPPORTING EVIDENCE FOR THE MIRACLES OF EGYPT (The Time of Joseph & Moses) Purpose: To show that the biblical miracles in Egypt are not merely myths, but have correlation with archaeological findings and ancient texts. --- A. MIRACLES IN THE TIME OF JOSEPH (Genesis 37–50) Event | Finding | Support | Strength of Evidence 7 years of plenty, 7 years of famine | Records of severe drought in the Middle Bronze Age (2100–1700 BC) throughout the Near East; Egyptian inscriptions mention "years of famine" | Moderate Joseph became second ruler in Egypt | Semitic-style tomb at Avaris (Tell el-Dab'a) with a statue in a colorful robe, nicknamed the "Asiatic King" | Moderate Joseph was slandered by Potiphar's wife | Papyrus D'Orbiney (The Tale of Two Brothers)—an ancient Egyptian story about a wife who seduces a righteous young man then slanders him | Strong (indirect) Name "Zaphenath-Pan...

Trinity and Doctrine - 7

Trinity and Doctrine - 7


This hypothesis attempts to answer a question that often arises in the church: "What happens to those who leave the Christian faith because they are confused by the doctrine of the Trinity?" And even deeper: "Can the judgment of others destroy a person's faith?"


Let us examine this with the guidance of Scripture and the interconnection of all the previous hypotheses.


---


1. Those Who Are Confused and Then Leave the Faith: Two Possibilities


There are two scenarios:


Scenario A: Never experienced love and forgiveness


"They never experienced love and forgiveness."


Biblical analysis: This is very possible. Someone who only received the doctrine of the Trinity as a cold formula (without ever feeling the Father's personal love, a heart connection with Jesus, or the comforting presence of the Holy Spirit) will easily abandon their faith when that doctrine feels confusing or unreasonable.


The parable of the rocky soil (Matthew 13:5-6, 20-21):


"He receives it at once with joy, but he has no root and endures only a while. When tribulation or persecution arises on account of the word, he immediately falls away."


Doctrinal confusion can become intellectual "persecution" that causes shallow faith to collapse. Jesus said they had no root meaning they never abided in love (John 15:4).


Scenario B: Once experienced, but then left it


"Or if they did, they have abandoned it."


Biblical analysis: This is more serious, reminiscent of the warning in Hebrews:


"For it is impossible, in the case of those who have once been enlightened... and then have fallen away, to restore them again to repentance." (Hebrews 6:4-6)


But a warning: We cannot know with certainty who falls into this category. Peter once experienced and denied Jesus but he repented. So only God knows whether the apostasy is final or whether there is still a way back.


So this part of the hypothesis is theologically valid (with the note: do not use it to judge).


---


2. If the Confusion Is Caused by the "Judgment" of Others


This is a very important pastoral point:


"If their confusion about the doctrine of the Trinity is due to the 'judgment' of others regarding their understanding of God's love, then their love should remain and forgive, thus remaining connected to the source of knowledge itself."


What does Scripture say?


Paul faced a similar situation in Rome and Corinth:


There were those weak in faith (who did not understand that all food was clean, or who honored certain days).

There were those strong in faith (who understood their freedom in Christ).

The problem: The strong judged the weak, and the weak judged the strong.


Paul said:


"Who are you to pass judgment on the servant of another? It is before his own master that he stands or falls." (Romans 14:4)


And then:


"Therefore let us not pass judgment on one another any longer, but rather decide never to put a stumbling block or hindrance in the way of a brother." (Romans 14:13)


Paul's conclusion: If someone's doctrinal understanding is not yet perfect (for example, about the Trinity), they should not be judged as long as they genuinely believe in Jesus as Lord.


What about the one who is judged?


Hypothesis: "Their love should remain and forgive, thus remaining connected to the source of knowledge itself."


This is true and noble, but it must be acknowledged: It is difficult. Not everyone has the spiritual maturity to forgive when unjustly judged. Jesus Himself taught:


"Blessed are you when others revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on My account." (Matthew 5:11)


But He also knows our weakness:


"The spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak." (Matthew 26:41)


So this hypothesis is the ideal of mature faith that if God's love truly abides in a person, they will be able not to be shaken by human judgment, and will continue to love (and even forgive) those who judge them. This is a calling, not an automatic description.


---


3. Continuing to Flow with Love as "Proof" of the Trinity's Existence


Hypothesis: Love that continues to flow from a person (even if they are doctrinally confused) is evidence that:


They remain connected to the source of knowledge (that is, God Himself, not doctrinal formulations).

The existence of the Trinity is proven not by theological arguments, but by the fruit of love that flows.


Biblical basis:


"Beloved, let us love one another, for love is from God, and whoever loves has been born of God and knows God." (1 John 4:7)


Notice: The proof of "knowing God" is not perfect doctrinal confession, but living in love. John even says:


"Anyone who does not love does not know God, because God is love." (1 John 4:8)


So love is the identifying mark not Trinitarian precision.


Jesus Himself said:


"By this all people will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another." (John 13:35)


He did not say, "if you correctly confess the Trinity." Not because the Trinity is unimportant, but because fruit proves the tree (Matthew 7:16-20).


---


4. Connection to Previous Hypotheses


Let us unite them in one table:


Core Hypothesis | Connection to This Hypothesis

1. Misunderstanding of doctrine (losing direction) destroys faith. | Confusion about the Trinity can cause a person to fall away if their faith is not rooted in love.

2. Adam and Eve's doubt about God's love. | The judgment of others can reinforce that doubt, causing a person to drift even further away.

3. Jesus commands us to love one another so that love may remain. | The one who is judged is called to continue loving that is the only way not to be cut off from the source.

4. "I never knew you" for servants without love. | Those who judge without love risk hearing that terrible word.

5. Rejecting the Trinity after knowing it is a lie and risks sin against the Holy Spirit. | This hypothesis is not about active rejection, but about passive confusion caused by wounds from others.

6. Those who are confused because they are judged must continue to love that is proof of the Trinity. | All previous hypotheses lead to this: Love is the final proof, not perfect doctrine.


---


5. Conclusion and Practical Application


For those who are confused and wounded by the judgment of others:


1. Understand that your confusion does not destroy God's love. Thomas's doubt did not make Jesus reject him (John 20:27).


2. Do not let human judgment sever your connection with God. His love is greater than your theological errors.


3. Strive to continue loving even those who judge you. This is difficult, but this is the only way for God's love to remain in you.


4. Do not abandon your faith because of confusing doctrine. Faith is not a perfect formulation, but dependence on the Person who loves you.


For those who judge others because of doctrinal misunderstanding:


1. Remember the terrifying word: "With the judgment you pronounce you will be judged" (Matthew 7:2).


2. Love is greater than doctrinal precision. If your doctrine is correct but does not produce love, you are like "a resounding gong" (1 Corinthians 13:1).


3. Stop being a stumbling block. Everyone who stumbles because of your attitude, their blood will be required of your hand (Ezekiel 3:18 in a pastoral context).


Final Statement:


The Trinity is not an entrance exam to the Kingdom of Heaven, but a description of how God loves us and flows His love through us. Those who love even if they are conceptually confused have already communed with the Trinity. Those who do not love even if their doctrine is perfect do not know God.


---


Final word:


Doctrine without love destroys.

Love without perfect doctrine still saves.

And love that continues to flow in the midst of confusion and wounds is the most authentic proof that the Trinity is real.


Shalom, Lord Jesus, protect and bless us all. Amen. 🙏


Click or Tap to see related articles:


Click or Tap here to read other articles

Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

The Theory of "Yahweh Outside Israel" (Latest Archaeological Evidence)

TRINITY : ENTITY or RELATION

The Fall, Theta, and the Lost Childlike Faith