Explaining the Resurrection - 3

-
Explaining the Resurrection - 3 Another Perspective APOLOGETICS DOCUMENT SUPPORTING EVIDENCE FOR THE MIRACLES OF EGYPT (The Time of Joseph & Moses) Purpose: To show that the biblical miracles in Egypt are not merely myths, but have correlation with archaeological findings and ancient texts. --- A. MIRACLES IN THE TIME OF JOSEPH (Genesis 37–50) Event | Finding | Support | Strength of Evidence 7 years of plenty, 7 years of famine | Records of severe drought in the Middle Bronze Age (2100–1700 BC) throughout the Near East; Egyptian inscriptions mention "years of famine" | Moderate Joseph became second ruler in Egypt | Semitic-style tomb at Avaris (Tell el-Dab'a) with a statue in a colorful robe, nicknamed the "Asiatic King" | Moderate Joseph was slandered by Potiphar's wife | Papyrus D'Orbiney (The Tale of Two Brothers)—an ancient Egyptian story about a wife who seduces a righteous young man then slanders him | Strong (indirect) Name "Zaphenath-Pan...
Posting Komentar

Trinity and Doctrine - 5

-

Trinity and Doctrine - 5


This hypothesis attempts to build a pastoral theology: starting from the problem (misunderstanding of doctrine), tracing its root (the doubt of Adam and Eve), finding Christ's solution (the command to love one another), and ending with the eschatological warning ("I never knew you").


Let us examine this interconnectedness systematically with the guidance of Scripture.


---


1. Misunderstanding of Doctrine Destroys Faith Because Doctrine Loses Its Purpose


As we have agreed: doctrine that is misconstrued (understood as a cold formula, not as a path toward love) actually kills. Scripture gives a concrete example:


"Yet you have some there who hold to the teaching of Balaam... So also you have some who hold to the teaching of the Nicolaitans." (Revelation 2:14-15)


These teachings may have been doctrinally "correct" in some respects, but because they did not produce love for God and neighbor, Jesus threatened to "wage war against them with the sword of My mouth."


Thus: Misunderstanding is not about informational correctness, but about losing direction—doctrine that should point to Love ends up becoming a wall.


---


2. When Love Is Abandoned, Even Toward Oneself The Root of Adam and Eve's Doubt


The hypothesis connects this to Doubt about God's Providence and Love. Scripture records the first sin not merely as a violation of law, but as doubt about God's goodness:


"Did God really say, 'You must not eat from any tree in the garden'?" (Genesis 3:1)


Satan turned God's providence (which is full of love and good boundaries) into something to be suspected: "God is holding something back from you."


The result:


Adam and Eve lost their security as beloved children.

They hid (instead of seeking God). This is the early form of "abandoning love for oneself"—they no longer saw themselves as valuable images of God.

They blamed one another (Adam blamed Eve, Eve blamed the serpent). Love for neighbor collapsed instantly.


Thus: Doubt about God's love Loss of love for oneself Loss of love for neighbor. This is the vicious cycle of sin.


---


3. Jesus Commands Us to Love One Another So That Love May "Remain" in Us


This is the way out of the vicious cycle above. The command to love one another is not merely ethical, but a means of remaining in God's love:


"As the Father has loved Me, I have also loved you; remain in My love... This is My command: Love each other as I have loved you." (John 15:9, 12)


Notice the order:


1. The Father's love Christ (transcendent source)

2. Christ's love disciples (love becomes real)

3. Disciples love one another (love flows horizontally)

4. Result: love remains in the disciples.


Without step 3 (loving one another), love does not "remain"—it is like water that does not flow, becoming stagnant and eventually putrid. Or as John says:


"Whoever does not love his brother whom he has seen cannot love God whom he has not seen." (1 John 4:20)


Thus: Loving one another is a small sacrament that keeps God's love fresh and real in our lives.


---


4. "I Never Knew You" Those Who Lost Love Even Though They Appeared to Be Serving


This is the most terrifying warning in the entire New Testament. Matthew 7:21-23 is Jesus' most frightening words because they are directed at people who:


Called Jesus "Lord, Lord" (correct doctrinal confession).

Prophesied, cast out demons, performed miracles (spectacular ministry).

But Jesus said: "I never knew you."


What were they missing? Love. Not love as a feeling, but love as fruit born from abiding in the vine (John 15:4-5). They served but did not abide in Christ's love. They were like branches detached from the vine—looking green for a while, but eventually drying up and being burned.


Connection to the hypothesis:


Misunderstanding of doctrine? They understood doctrine (they knew Jesus' name and His power).

Love abandoned? Yes: They served for themselves (power, recognition, miracles), not for the glory of God who is Love.

The doubt of Adam and Eve? They doubted that simply abiding in love was enough—they felt they needed to "do something great."


---


5. The Interconnection of All Hypotheses: One Unified Cycle


The hypothesis attempts to build a complete cycle of faith. Let me illustrate it in a flow:


Doubt over God's Love (like Adam and Eve)


Diminishes the feeling of "being loved" in oneself


Doctrine is studied as a cold formula, not as a path toward Love


Misunderstanding (in the sense of losing direction) faith becomes fragile


Service continues but without love becomes hypocrisy


Jesus says: "I never knew you" even though they appeared to serve


(The opposite:) Jesus' solution: Love one another so that love may remain


Love that remains faith is restored doctrine returns to its function


This is not a vicious cycle, but a cycle of salvation centered on the flowing Love of the Trinity.


---


Conclusion


Hypothesis | Key Verse

Misunderstanding of doctrine (losing direction) destroys faith | 1 Timothy 1:5-7

Love is abandoned, even toward oneself, rooted in the doubt of Adam and Eve | Genesis 3:1-13

Jesus commands us to love one another so that love may remain | John 15:9-12

"I never knew you" is directed at servants without love | Matthew 7:21-23

All hypotheses are connected in one cycle of faith | 1 John 4:7-21


---


Closing: Not Merely Analysis, But a Call


The narrative does not merely arrange theological hypotheses—it attempts to depict the most common spiritual illness in the church today: serving without abiding in love, understanding doctrine but losing the heart.


One final question that does not need to be answered here, but reflected upon:


Am I currently "serving" but secretly doubting that God truly loves me personally? If so, perhaps this is the time to pause for a moment—not to stop serving, but to stop in order to return to abiding in His love—because without that, all service is merely "a resounding gong."


Shalom, Lord Jesus, protect and bless us all. Amen. 🙏


Click or Tap to see related articles:


Click or Tap here to read other articles

Komentar

Posting Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

The Theory of "Yahweh Outside Israel" (Latest Archaeological Evidence)

-
The Theory of "Yahweh Outside Israel" (Latest Archaeological Evidence) There are several recent theories and findings that attempt to link other nations outside of ancient Israel with the worship of Yahweh (or a similar deity). However, most are still speculative or controversial. Here are some modern approaches: a. Kuntillet Ajrud Inscription (8th Century BC, Sinai) -   An inscription was found reading "Yahweh and his Asherah" (possibly referring to a divine pair of Yahweh and the goddess Asherah). -   It indicates that Yahweh was worshipped in regions outside Israel, perhaps by Edomites or Midianites. b. Khirbet el-Qom Inscription (Ancient Judea) -   Contains the name "Yahweh" alongside a phrase of protection, suggesting the worship of Yahweh among non-Israelites (or at least its influence). c. The Midianite-Kenite Hypothesis (The Origin of Yahweh Before Israel) -   Some scholars (like Prof. Thomas Römer) argue that Yahweh may have originated as a storm ...
Baca selengkapnya

TRINITY : ENTITY or RELATION

-
  TRINITY: ENTITY OR RELATION?  Introduction   As modern individuals, "cutting off relationships" is commonplace, but in Christianity, it is a sin. Remember, the definition of sin is the severance of humanity’s relationship with God. Logically, this makes no sense. We do harmful things to others and nature, but how does that relate to a "relationship"? Can nature even speak and converse? And why?   Here’s why our God is called the Trinity and how this naming relates to the definition of creation and sin.   This writing is divided into four parts:   I. THEOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: TEXTUAL, HERMENEUTICS, AND LOGIC   II. THE TRINITY AS THE CORE OF RELATION AND CREATION   III. THE RELATIONAL GOD VS. HUMAN EXPERIENCE   IV. CONCLUSION: THE TRINITARIAN SYMPHONY OF LOVE   ---    TRINITY: The Harmony Between Mystery, Text, and Logic   God is multidimensional because He is Trinity. The pr...
Baca selengkapnya

The Fall, Theta, and the Lost Childlike Faith

-
  The Fall, Theta, and the Lost Childlike Faith: A Reflection on Knowledge and Innocence    Introduction   The story of Adam and Eve’s expulsion from Eden is more than a myth—it’s a profound exploration of humanity’s shift from innocent unity to fractured duality. At its core lies a paradox: the very knowledge that was supposed to make them "like God" (Genesis 3:5) instead alienated them from divine communion. What if this transition mirrors a deeper metaphysical principle—one that can even be framed through the lens of mathematics, physics, and theology?   This article examines the "theta state" of primordial innocence, the collapse into moral duality after eating the forbidden fruit, and Jesus’ call to reclaim childlike faith—not as ignorance, but as surrendered wisdom.   ---    1. Theta (θ): The State of Sacred Ignorance   Before the Fall, Adam and Eve existed in a state of pure relational trust—unashamed, una...
Baca selengkapnya